|

Legend of Queen
Emma's Infidelity
By Herbert J. Reid
R O
Y A L
O R
E A L
Queen Emma's Odreal by
Fire at Winchester

There is a curious
legend concerning the Old Minster at
Winchester and the gift to the See of
several old manors of the southern
counties of Hampshire, Wiltshire,
Berkshire and Buckinghamshire. With the
assistance of extracts from the Domesday
Book, Herbert J. Reid endeavours to prove
this legend untrue.
The Story
demands most careful and critical
examination, for, in common with most
legends, it undoubtedly originated in
some fact, which at a later date became
perverted. The great difficulty is to
ascertain the facts. Nearly all the
historians from the 13th century
downwards, relate the story of Queen Emma
and her Ordeal of walking over red hot
ploughshares in Winchester Cathedral (ie.
the Old Minster). Before relating the
legend there are two remarks to be made,
which should be carefully borne in mind.
In the first place, no contemporary
authority for the story exists; further,
what we are able to gather from
contemporary writings, cannot be easily
reconciled with it.
Queen
Emma, the heroine of this story, is
believed, in Berkshire, to have resided
at Wargrave, one of the manors in
question. Until the year 1827, a very
ancient building, called Queen Emma's
Palace, was pointed out as having been
occupied by her; but although of great
antiquity, we believe that this building
does not date back beyond the end of the
15th century, probably even later. Our
illustration is from a drawing by the
late Mrs. Hitchings, taken in the year
1827. The Palace was demolished in that
year, but a barn, also of great age,
remained until well into the late
nineteenth century, which bore the name
of Emma's Barn. Examples of the tenacity
with which names connected with any
legend will cling to a locality, even
when they have no foundation whatever in
fact. In this case it will be shown that
Emma, although she may possibly have
resided at Wargrave, certainly never
possessed the Manor, and consequently
could not have given it to Winchester
Cathedral, as a thank-offering for her
delivery from the Ordeal.
Emma, or
lfgifa, fair Maid of Normandy, was,
it will be remembered, wife first of King
Aethelred the Unready, and afterwards of
Canute the Great. She was the mother,
therefore, not only of Harthacnut, but
also of Edward the Confessor. Edward,
after he obtained the crown, appears to
have had little confidence in his mother,
probably in consequence of her having
favoured the pretensions of the children
of her second husband, instead of
supporting the claim of Edward to the
throne. It is impossible to enter into a
discussion here as to the merits of the
case, but it is certain the mind of
Edward was easily influenced. So that the
fact of his mother being despoiled of her
property by him at the instigation of
others need excite little surprise - the
more so, as he acted in a precisely
similar manner by his wife, Edith. Upon
this disgrace, perhaps, the whole story
has been founded.
The
following account, for which we are
largely indebted to Professor Freeman's
"Norman Conquest," is a summary
of the legend. It will be found at great
length in Dugdale's Monasticon,
fo. 34, Vol. 1, and also in Bromton, X.
Scriptores, fo. 941.
The Legend of
Queen Emma.
Robert,
Archbishop of Canterbury, persuades the
King that Emma, forty-eight years after
her first marriage, fifteen years after
the death of her second husband, Canute,
had been guilty of too close an intimacy
with Aelfwine, Bishop of Winchester. The
choice of an Episcopal lover was unlucky,
as Aelfwine had been dead three years; a
more ingenious romancer would have named
Stigand. The Bishop is imprisoned, the
Lady is spoiled of her goods, and sent to
Wherwell Priory.
From her prison,
where she was not very strictly confined,
Emma writes to those Bishops in whom she
trusted, saying, she is far more shocked
at the scandal against Aelfwine, than at
the scandal against herself. She is even
ready to submit to the ordeal of burning
iron in order to prove the Bishop's
innocence.
The other
Bishops advise the King to allow the
trial, but the Norman Archbishop uses
very strong language indeed. Emma is
"a wild thing, not a woman;"
her daring went so far that, "she
called her slimy lover, Christ the
Lord," and so forth; she may make
compurgation for the Bishop, but who will
make compurgation for herself? Yet, if
she will make a double purgation, if she
will walk over four burning shares for
herself, and five for the Bishop, her
innocence shall be allowed. Preparations
for the ordeal are made accordingly, Emma
passing the night before in prayer at the
shrine of St. Swithun, who, in answer to
her supplications, appears to her,
announcing himself, "I am St.
Swithun whom you have invoked; fear not,
the fire shall do you no hurt."
On the morrow,
the King with his attendant courtiers
assemble; the nine ploughshares are made
red-hot, and placed upon the pavement in
the Church. Emma now enters, and after
making a long invocation, which
commences, "Oh God, who didst save
Susannah from the malice of the wicked
elders, save me," treads with her
bare feet upon the glowing metal: but she
senses nothing. She has touched it, yet
enquires of the Bishops who lead her by
the hand, "When shall we come to the
ploughshares?" They show her she has
already passed over them. Upon
examination, her feet are found to be
uninjured - "See the Miracle".
The King is now thoroughly convinced of
her innocence, and repenting his cruelty,
casts himself at his mother's feet,
exclaiming, "Mother, I have sinned
before heaven and before you,"
receives stripes both from the Bishop and
his mother, restores all their
confiscated property, and banishes the
Archbishop.
The
Winchester Annalist, says Professor
Freeman, is very much fuller, and after
his manner puts long speeches into the
mouths of his actors; that made by the
Norman Archbishop, displaying a
remarkable acquaintance with the less
decent parts of the satires of Juvenal.
The MS.
also tells us that:
"Queen Emma having
possession of all the manors of her
dowry, which had been confirmed to her by
the former Kings, was not of her
preserver, and gave the same day as an
offering to St. Swithun, for nine
ploughshares, nine manors."
Rudborne
gives the names of these manors, as well
as those supposed to have been given at
the same time by (deceased!) Bishop
Aelfwine; those given by the King are
also named, these latter varying slightly
in different accounts. To test the
accuracy of these writers, and to show
that Emina did not give them as stated, a
very careful examination of Domesday has
been made, proving that the greater
number of these manors were neither hers,
Bishop Aelfwine's, nor the King's to
give. Emma, it will be remembered, died
A.D. 1052; Aelfwine, who was accused with
her, had died ten years previously.
Winchester Book, or Domesday, was
compiled about 1086. Many years had not
elapsed, and one might naturally expect
corroboration of the story. Some, if not
all, of these twenty-one manors if given
to Winchester forty years previously,
would surely be claimed by the Bishops
under these gifts, and, unless the story
is absolutely a fabrication, evidence of
some sort should be forthcoming. Let us
examine first Emma's manors, next Bishop
Aelfwine's, and lastly the King's. The
identification has in some cases been
difficult, but the following is believed
to be correct.
Emma's
Manors
| (1.) Brandesbyri
|
Bramsbury,
Hants. |
| (2.) Berchefelde,
or Borgefel |
Burghfield,
Berks. |
| (3.) Howthtone,
or Houston |
Haughton,
Wilts. |
| (4.) Fyfhyde
|
Fyfield,
Wilts. |
| (5.) Mechelmershe
|
Mitchelmarsh,
Hants. |
| (6.) Yuingeo
|
Ivingho,
Bucks. |
| (7.) Wicombe
|
Wycombe,
Bucks. |
| (8.) Weregravys
|
Wargrave,
Berks. |
| (9.) Haylinge
|
Hayling,
Hants. |
Of these
manors we find notice in Domesday as
follows:
(1.)
Brandesberre is described as
"Land for the victualling of the
monks of Winchester." It is added,
"Abbot Alsi held it of Bishop
Stigand and of the monks in the time of
King Edward."
(2.) Berchefelde,
or Borgefel. Lands of Ralph de
Mortemar. The same Ralph holds
Burghfield, and a certain (knight) holds
of him. Abbot Elsi held it of the old
monastery of the Church at
Winchester, by witness of the shire in
the time of King Edward, and afterwards
until he was outlawed.
(3.)
Howthtone, or Houston. The Bishop of
Winchester holds Haughton in demesne. It always
belonged to the Bishopric.
(4.)
Fyfhide, Wiltescire. Land of the
Bishop of Winchester. The same Bishop (of
Winchester) holds Fyfield and Edward of
him, and he paid for five hides (hence
the name Fyfhide) in the time of King
Edward (the Confessor). This land was
appropriated to the Sacristan of the
church. Alsi held it of the Bishop.
(5.)
Mechelmershe, or Mychelm-meryshe. Mitchelmarsh
is not mentioned at all, and would
appear not to have been formed into a
manor until a later date.
(6.)
Yuingeo, or Ivyngeho, or Evingehow. The
same Bishop (of Winchester) holds
Ivingho. This manor lay and lays in the
demesne of the church of St. Peter of
Winchester.
(7.)
Wicombe. Walchelin, Bishop of
Winchester, holds Wycombe. Stigand held
it in the time of King Edward.
(8.)
Weregrave. The King holds in demesne
Wargrave. Edith held it.
(9.)
Haylinge. The Land of St. Peter of
Jumieges. The Abbey of Jumieges holds
Hayling. Ulward held it of Edith the
Queen as allodium. This manor which the
monks lay claim to, from the Bishopric of
Winchester, because Emma the Queen had
given this to the Church of St. Peter and
St. Swithun and then gave seizin of a
moiety to the monks; and she then demised
the other moiety to Ulward for his life
only, that, after his death ... the manor
should return to the monastery. And this
Ulward held a part of the manor from the
monks until he died in the time of King
William. And to this Elsi the Abbot of
Ramsey testifies, and the whole hundred.
There is
little question but a survey of some
description had been made in the
Confessor's time, forming the basis of
Domesday. The latter gives always the
values in the time of King Edward, as
also the names of the persons holding the
property, this being probably to
facilitate its identification. Queen
Edith appears to have had considerable
possessions, her name occurring
frequently. For example:
The
King's Holdings in Hampshire.
The King
(i.e. William I) holds Haustige.
Edith the Queen held it in the time of
King Edward.
The King
holds Greteham. Edith the Queen held it
in the time of King Edward.
The King
holds Optune. Of the land of Edith the
Queen, in the time of King Edward.
Cheping
holds Candever of the King. Sberne held
it of' Queen Edith in the time of King
Edward.
Agemund
holds Sottesdene of the King, and he
himself held it of Queen Edith as alodium.
This last
word gives a faint possible clue. It will
have been remarked that Hayling was
claimed by Winchester as an allodial
manor of Queen Emma's. It is just
possible her gifts may have been in other
cases similar to this one: but it is
scarcely probable, or it would have been
recorded in more instances than in that
of Hayling. This is the only one of the
nine manors stated to have been given by
Emma to Winchester that has even this
slight shadow of confirmation from
Domesday of having belonged to her.
Several others, indeed, are mentioned as
being held by the Bishops at the time of
King Edward, but it is also said they
belonged to the Bishopric always, or were
appropriated for victualling or other
purposes. Mitchelmarsh is not in Domesday
at all, and Wargrave is distinctly given,
first as Edith's, and afterwards as the
King's. Thus, it was impossible for Emma
to give it away, not being hers to
dispose of. So far, then, the Bishops of
Winchester possess, after a lapse of only
forty years, but six of the nine manors
which Emma is credited with having given
them. Only one has any evidence to adduce
as proof of ever having belonged to her,
and this the very vaguest and most
improbable.
It will be
as well to continue the examination into
the manors alleged to have been given by
Aelfwine, which, according to Rudborne,
are Stoneham, Meones (two manors),
Neuton, Witeney, Heling, Melbrok or
Mellebrog, Polhampton or Polemtune, and
Hodingtone.
(1.)
Stoneham, Hants. The Bishop of
Winchester holds it for the victualling
of the monastery. It always belonged to
the monastery.
(2.)
Menes (two manors). The King himself
holds Menes. Stigand, the Archbishop,
held it in the time of King Edward for
the need [or work] of the monks, and
afterwards as long as he lived he
held it.
(3.)
Menes. The Bishop himself holds Menes
in demesne. It was always in the
Bishopric.
(4.)
Neuton. The Archbishop of Canterbury
holds Neuton. It belonged, and does
belong to the Church.
(5.)
Witeney. The Bishop of Winchester
holds Witney. Stigand, the Archbishop,
held it.
(6.) Heling.
If this is Hayling, it is already
accounted for under Emma's alleged gifts,
but if not, there is no record and
no other place to identify it with.
(7.) Mellebrog,
or Milbrok. Belonged always to the
Monastery (of Winchester).
(8.)
Polemtune. There appear to have been
two manors of this name:
(a.)
Ralph, son of Seifred, holds Polemtune of
the Bishop (of Winchester). In the time
of King Edward it was for the victualling
of the Monks.
(b.) Wills
Bertram holds of the King,
Polemtune. Tosti held it in the time of
King Edward.
Here again
are seven manors out of the nine actually
owned by the Church of Winchester. Some
have always belonged to the monastery, or
are for their provisioning, as before,
yet not one is claimed as a gift from
Aelfwine. One it will be remarked was
held by Stigand "as long as he
lived" and, since he did not die
until A.D. 1070, he could not have given
this Manor. The King gives, according to
one chronicle, the two Meons and
Porthland, or in another version,
Porthland, Wike, Hollewelle, and
Waymouth. The two Meons we have already
seen are said to have been given by
Aelfwine. Hollewelle and Wike we find no
trace of, Portland and Weymouth are both
in Dorsetshire in which county, at the
Survey, the Church of Winchester had no
possessions.
The result
of the enquiry is not flattering
to the veracity of the
before-mentioned annalists. Of the
twenty-one (or twenty-two) manors they
distinctly say were given by these three
individuals to the Church of Winchester
upon a very special occasion, only
thirteen actually are held by the Bishops
at the Survey. The remainder are either
not identified, were not formed into
manors until a much later date, or are
held by other possessors. The only
conclusion to be formed from all the
evidence is that the legend, not being
found previous to the Winchester Annals,
Rudborne or Bromton, was fabricated by
one of them. To give a greater
semblance of truth to the story,
manors which at their time were
actually owned by the Bishopric of Winchester
were selected, without much judgement, to
fit the story of the ploughshares. When
they wrote, Wargrave was in the
possession of Winchester, Mitchelmarsh
had become a manor, and is so described
in various documents.
Stigand,
as suggested by Professor Freeman, would
have supported their story far better. He
is constantly mentioned in Domesday, and
as holding some of these manors;
he was also very intimate with Queen
Emma, who died A.D. 1052, and was
interred at Winchester by the side of her
second husband, Canute. An interesting
account of the demolition of their tombs
by the Parliamentarians is given by
"Mercurius Rusticus," who,
after describing the violation of the
royal tombs, concludes his lengthy
remarks as follows:
"and, as if they
meant (if it had been possible) to make
these bones contract posthumous guilt ...
those windows which they could not reach
with their swords, muskets, or rests,
they broke to pieces by throwing at them
the bones of Kings, Queens, Bishops,
Confessors or Saints, so that the spoil
done on the windows will not be repaired
for £1,000."
The above
article is reproduced from "The
History of Wargrave"
by
Herbert J. Reid, 1885
|