 |
The History of
The Rose Theatre
By David Nash Ford

London is well known
today for its theatrical attractions. Before the
first of these were built in Shoreditch in the
1570s, plays were mostly performed in tavern
yards, sometimes in the streets or on temporary
stages or carts. Bankside in Southwark, outside
the jurisdiction of the City fathers, quickly
became the home of Elizabethan theatre, and it
all started with the playhouse called 'The Rose'.
On 10th January 1587, two South
London businessmen, Philip Henslowe and John
Cholmley, signed an agreement to build a
playhouse in Bankside and run it together for
eight years. Though the profits from this
endevour were to be divided equally, being a
grocer, Cholmley was to retain sole interest in a
house for selling refreshments at the southern
end of the theatre plot. At the time of the
agreement, the theatre itself was already in the
process of being erected by their carpenter, John
Grigge, on the site of a house known as 'The
Rose'. The building is known to have been open to
the public by October of the same year when there
was a complaint about plays being acted on the
Sabbath. It may have originally been intended as
a more general place of entertainment, but the
building soon became known as 'The Playhouse':
the only one in Southwark.
Cholmley appears to have died
some time before the eight year partnership was
up. From at least 1595, Henslowe was working
alone. It may have been from this time that the
theatre gained its new name. In 1596, the
Dutchman, Johann De Witt, wrote of it as 'The
Rose' on account of the sign which hung outside
it. Henslowe was a dyer who had married his dead
master's widow. He lived in Clink Street in
Southwark and had several property interests in
the area as well as holding minor positions at
court. He is said to have been a generous man,
allowing various companies to perform at his
theatre and giving out loans for some
productions. However, money leant was quickly
paid back from the first takings and Henslowe was
said to have had few scruples in his business
dealings.
Much is known about Henslowe's
time at 'The Rose,' due to the survival of his
papers which were placed in the library of
Dulwich College by its founder (1619), the
principal actor of the company known as The
Admiral's Men and Henslowe's son-in-law, Edward
Alleyn.
The Admiral's Men appear to have arrived
at 'The Rose' in May 1591 after they split from
the company of London's most famous actor,
Richard Burbage, at 'The Theatre'. They probably
brought with them, in their repertoire, plays by
Robert Greene and especially Christopher Marlowe
who became particularly associated with 'The
Rose'. Edward Alleyn married Henslowe's
step-daughter in 1592 and the two men became
partners in several theatrical ventures. Grigge
undertook major alterations for them at the
Globe. They bought the nearby 'Bear Garden' and
later established both 'The Hope' and 'The
Fortune' Playhouses.
Lord Strange's Company
performed at the Rose throughout 1592, but the
Admiral's men remained the playhouse's mainstay.
In March, they showed off their theatrical skills
in a play called 'Henry VI' and it is generally
accepted that this was the version written by
William Shakespeare, though there were other
contemporary plays of the same name. It has even
been tentatively suggested that Shakespeare may
have been attached to the company at this time
and may have walked the boards of 'The Rose'.
Disorder in the city led to the
suspension of all theatrical events until
December 1592. Their return saw the premier of
Marlowe's 'Massacre at Paris' held at the Rose in
early 1593. Plague forced another closure in
February until the end of year. By this time, the
repertoire of the Admiral's Men was seriously
depleted. There were no new plays from Robert
Greene, Thomas Kyd or Christopher Marlowe who
were all dead.
Several other companies took to
playing at 'The Rose': The Queens' Men and Lord
Sussex's Men who staged Shakespeare's 'Titus
Andronicus' in January 1594, though this was
probably not a premier performance. By May,
however, Alleyn had restored the Admiral's Men to
life. They returned to 'The Rose' and entertained
audiences there for some seven years. At their
height, in the year from June 1595, they acted
out nearly three hundred performances of
thirty-six plays, twenty of which were new. There
were occasional closures due to the plague or
riots, such as at Southwark Market, but the Rose
thrived and Henslowe was able to give the theatre
a cosmetic overhaul.
However, the decline of 'The
Rose' was on the horizon. In the Winter of
1595-6, 'The Swan' playhouse opened nearby.
Performances at 'The Rose' began to be reduced in
the face of this new competition. People were
turning more to comedies and tragedies, rather
than the great history plays for which 'The Rose'
was renowned. Then, in 1598, Ben Johnson killed
his fellow Rose actor, Gabriel Spencer, in a dual
in Shoreditch where both men lived. Alleyn
decided to retire and Henslowe shifted his
position from landlord and banker to that of full
financial manager. The entries in his papers
begin to dwindle at this point.
It was a bad time for theatres
as a whole. A now-lost play called 'The Isle of
Dogs' performed at 'The Swan' was thought to be
seditious and the Privy Council considered
closing all the playhouses. There was a temporary
closure of 'The Swan' until mid-September.
By the Spring of 1599, 'The
Rose' was receiving still further competition
from the newly opened 'Globe' theatre. The
Chamberlain's Men, under Richard Burbage, were
performing Shakespeare's plays there to great
acclaim. In January the following year, Henslowe
and Alleyn turned their attentions north of the
Thames and built 'The Fortune' using Peter Street
who had erected 'The Globe'. Despite the decaying
state of 'The Rose,' the Admiral's Men had
several months of success there until their last
appearance in July 1600. They moved to 'The
Fortune' in November with Alleyn coming out of
retirement to help them on their way.
'The Rose' was left in the
hands of Philip Henslowe's actor-manager nephew,
Francis. Lord Pembroke's Men appeared there
briefly in August 1600, but it largely remained
unoccupied until August 1602. There was a
short-lived revival under Lord Worcester's Men
and Will Kempe. New plays brought success, but
this was cut short by mourning for the death of
Queen Elizabeth I in March 1603. The theatres
reopened in May, but it seems that 'The Rose' had
withered at last. Plague again forced its final
closure. Henslowe's lease ran out in 1605
and the playhouse was demolished soon afterward.
For many centuries, only Rose Alley remained
to show where this historic building had stood.
However, in 1989, the extant remains of the
theatre were discovered and partly excavated.
After a lively campaign to 'Save the Rose,' the
area has been preserved for future investigation
and an exhibition of the theatre's history is now
open
to the public there.
Sources
..............
Aaron Atte Southwerk (1994) An Hystory of
ye Southwerk
Julian Bowsher (1998) The Rose Theatre: An
Archaeological Discovery
Robert J. Godley (1996) Southwark: A History
of Bankside, Bermondsey and 'The Borough'.
Elizabeth Gurr (1998) Shakespeare's Globe: The
Guidebook
The Rose Theatre Trust (1990) The Rose
Theatre: Past, Present & Future
Jean Wilson (1995) The Shakespeare Legacy
Ben Weinreb & Christopher Hibbert (1983) The
London Encyclopaedia
Rosemary Weinstein (1994) Tudor London
The
Rose Exhibition Opens
Southwark
and William Shakespeare
Copyright ©1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 Britannia Internet Magazine. Design by Unica Multimedia |