|

History of the
Post-Conquest Earls' Revolt
By Geoff Boxell
R E
V O L T OF
T H
E
E A R L S
Wedding
Reception turns to Rebellion
Quote from
the contemporary Anglo-Saxon Chronicle:
"A.D.
1075. This year King William gave Earl
Ralph the daughter of William
Fitz-Osborne to wife. This same Ralph was
Breton on his mother's side; but his
father, whose name was also Ralph, was
English; and born in Norfolk. The king
therefore gave his son the earldom of
Norfolk and Suffolk; and he then led the
bride to Norwich. There was that
bride-ale. The source of man's bale.
There was Earl Roger, and Earl Waltheof,
and bishops, and abbots; who there
resolved, that they would drive the king
out of the realm of England. But it was
soon told the king in Normandy how it was
determined. It was Earl Roger and Earl
Ralph who were the authors of that plot;
and who enticed the Britons to them, and
sent eastward to Denmark after a fleet to
assist them. Roger went westward to his
earldom, and collected his people there,
to the king's annoyance, as he thought;
but it was to the great disadvantage of
himself. He was however prevented. Ralph
also in his earldom would go forth with
his people; but the castlemen that were
in England and also the people of the
land, came against him, and prevented him
from doing anything. He escaped however
to the ships at Norwich. And his wife was
in the castle; which she held until peace
was made with her; when she went out of
England, with all her men who wished to
join her. The king afterwards came to
England, and seized Earl Roger, his
relative, and put him in prison. And Earl
Waltheof went over sea, and betrayed
himself; but he asked forgiveness, and
proffered gifts of ransom. The king,
however, let him off lightly, until he
came to England; when he had him seized.
Soon
after that came east from Denmark two
hundred ships; wherein were two captains,
Cnute Swainson, and Earl Hacco; but they
durst not maintain a fight with King
William. They went rather to York, and
broke into St. Peter's minster, and took
therein much treasure, and so went away.
They made for Flanders over sea; but they
all perished who were privy to that
design; that was, the son of Earl Hacco,
and many others with him. This year died
the Lady Edgitha, who was the relict of
King Edward, seven nights before
Christmas, at Winchester; and the king
caused her to be brought to Westminster
with great pomp; and he laid her with
King Edward, her lord. And the king was
then at Westminster, at midwinter; where
all the Britons were condemned who were
at the bride-ale at Norwich. Some were
punished with blindness; some were driven
from the land; and some were towed to
Scandinavia. So were the traitors of King
William subdued."
The ASC
speaks of Earl Ralf's origins in some
detail. It omits to say that the lands
held by his Breton mother were much
richer than those of his English father.
Ralf grew up in Brittany and inherited
his mother's estates and thus was known
as Ralf Gael. He, like his co-plotter
Roger of Hereford, fought for William the
Bastard at Hastings.
Earl Roger
of Hereford was English on his mother's
side and born in Hereford. He was Ralf's
brother-in-law. Other versions of the ASC
say that, rather than King William giving
Roger's sister to Ralf in marriage, he
actually forbade it, presumably because
it would have united two very powerful
land holders whose holdings would enable
them to literally cut England in two,
should they wish to do so.
The plot
that was formulated at Ralf's bridal ale
(wedding feast) involved not only the two
earls. In addition to bringing in Danish
support, they also appear to have tried
to bring in both Edric the Wild and Earl
Waltheof. Waltheof declined to be
involved in the plot, but also declined
to betray them. If successful, the
simultaneous rising of the Earls would
have cut England in two. Somehow the
timing got out of alignment and William
was able to crush Roger, before dealing
to Ralf. The only memorable event was the
defence of Norwich by Ralf's new bride,
Emma, where she withstood siege for three
months after her husband had left to seek
aid from the Danes. The fleet of 200
ships arrived too late to lift the siege.
Of the
Earls: Ralf made it to his Breton
holdings to be joined by his wife, and
there he continued his fight against the
Normans. His punishment was loosing all
right to his English lands. Earl Roger
was also disinherited. Unfortunately for
him he had been captured and spent the
rest of his life in prison. Earl
Waltheof, having refused to take part in
the revolt, had none-the-less to swear an
oath of secrecy. Taking the advice of
Lanfranc, the Archbishop of Canterbury,
he revealed the whole plan to King
William. At first the king accepted
Waltheof's protestations of innocence
but, some say on the information given to
him by his niece Judith, Waltheof's wife,
he later charged the Earl of Northampton
with treason and had him beheaded. The
English and many Normans were aghast at
the execution. Soon miracles were
reported at Waltheof's tomb and it
rapidly became a place of pilgrimage.
Many contemporaries said that King
William's luck changed from then onwards
as a result of Divine judgment.
There is
no hard evidence that Edric the Wild took
part in the revolt. The Mortimer family
appears in the Domesday Book as owning
much of Edric's land. There is no record
of his land being confiscated, so they
may have obtained it through marriage.
One of the reasons for thinking that
Edric would not have taken part is that
he had been in arms against Roger of
Hereford in 1067. Mind, he had spent a
lifetime fighting the Welsh, and yet was
content to have them as allies against
the Normans.
Geoff
Boxell is
author of the novel: "Woden's
Wolf" that deals with the English
resistance to the Norman Conquest.
|