 |
The
Marian Chalice: The Holy Grail?

The Tradition: At the crucifixion, it
was not St. Joseph of
Arimathea, but St. Mary Magdalene
who tended to Christ and collected his blood in a
small cup which thence became known as the
"Marian Chalice". It was supposedly
found by St. Helen when she excavated Christ's
tomb in the early 4th century. It was taken to
Rome, but was later removed to Britain when the
city was sacked by the Visigoths in AD 410.
The Theory: Graham Phillips believes
that the real Holy Grail was a secret Christian
book, the Gospel of Thomas, a copy of which was
discovered in Egypt in 1945. However, he also
theorises that, through the belief that the Grail
was a cup, it was confused with the legendary
Marian Chalice. His hypothesis supposes that the
chalice would have been brought to the chief 5th
century City of Britain, Caer-Guricon (Wroxeter),
which he and Martin Keatman identify as the
capital of their King Arthur. The great
King and his descendants are therefore seen as
the Grail guardians: a lineage which he traces to
Payne Peveril, the original of Percival, and on
to his great grandson Sir Fulk FitzWaryn. Sir
Fulk is the subject of a long rambling 13th
century ballad which claims that the Grail was
housed in his private chapel at Whittington
Castle in Shropshire. It was removed to Alberbury
Priory on his death, from where a further
descendant, Robert Vernon, recovered it in the
late 16th century. It was eventually
hidden in a statue of St. John erected in
Hawkstone Park, near the family estate, in the
1850s. Here a small Roman onyx scent jar was
discovered in 1934. Is this the Holy Grail?
Possible
interpretations & Criticism: Phillips' ideas are long
and complicated and his conclusions rely heavily
on previous argument, particularly his
identification of King Arthur as a supposed ruler
of Caer-Guricon named Owain Danwyn (White-Tooth).
The Fulk FitzWaryn connection is an intriguing
grail-link which has never been satisfactorily
explained and Philllips makes a good attempt at
explaining it, though the ancestral grail
inheritance into the 1850s is not terribly
convincing.
Copyright ©1999, 2000 Britannia Internet Magazine. Design by Unica Multimedia |